My continued research into the world of BDSM reveals new and delightful/horrifying words and concepts.
What would the position of submales be in a gynarchic society ?
A submale in a Gynarchic society will have no human rights at all. No human rights whatsoever. Every submale will be the private property of a female and she may use, or misuse, this property in any way she wants. No rights whatsoever for submales! Their status will be lower even than that of domestic animals! Every submale member of Gynarchy International should reflect very carefully on this !
What’s about fatherhood in gynarchic society ?
Concept of “fatherhood” has to be destroyed. Gynarchy never will recognize any male genitor right ! Do you really think a male should be useful in any way for procreation or children conception ? Gynarchy well knows that a male semen was necessary in a small party of the process of birth. But this semen is now a Womyn’s property and only a Womyn have right to get it at a sperm’s bank (or eventually directly at natural production if the Mother wants) and to use it for Her and her Children. To talk about “fatherhood” is a bit like to want to give a right about our health to the plants for giving us air, or to the earthworm for ploughing earth. But, naturally, a submale could be put in educational duties (but not only this milked for the semence, perhaps died many years before the birth !) especially the dirty duties during the first years of his owner’s daughter (or son, if they are not euthanasied or put in educational structures for males). Male is for serve Womyn, even during the Daughter’s education. Evidently, the Daughter, since her birth, has authority on all males that are serving the Mother for her education. If the male, by chance, was the provider of the semence that helped to her birth, the small or young Girl never could be sure of this and treat him differently as another serving submale. Male is for serving Womyn in all ways, even the semence milking (if he is a beautiful, strong and intelligent submale) and the educational and maternal duties. Submales, when Gynarchy everywhere practised, will be very proud to serve a young girl. A submale who submissively and efficiently served several babies or little girls will be well considered by the Sorority.
Males that have grown up in a minimum to two generations of Matriarchal family rule make the most ideal candidates for owning, as they have had an optimum amount of exposure to women in control.
corbin
ahh the mad swinging of a crazy pendulum.
centrist thoughts of mutual respect anyone?
Ben Emlyn-Jones
ML wrote:
"But, not so long ago, this is exactly what women had to do once they got married."
All the more reason to end gender wars and discrimination.
Hugh
Everyone’s always fighting over whose form of discrimination is the worst, but few make any effort to end all discrimination. Racism, sexism, whatever. It all needs to be stopped.
marmitelover
Sorry guys. I'm just telling you the extremes of what is out there in our lovely world.
corbin
no apology's necessary.
you delight and intrigue.
do go on …
Anonymous
That's a horse of another colour.
Giorgio
this is just a male fantasy. There is no woman who is not a pro domme or fin domme who endorse this. Traditionally the Gynarchy preachers has always been male, at least for the two last centuries. Women just play along.
Anonymous
this is the truest thing, let me tell you. all of this stuff is written by submissive men for submissive men, and they love it. take it from a pro Domme who deals with this *often*.
Anonymous
It does have some crossover with strands of radical feminist ideology, but in general I agree
ROTCHBURNS
Not true, you just haven’t looked hard enough. See: Gynarchy Global (WARNING: LOTS OF TALK OF TORTURE AND CASTRATIONS, WOULD NOT RECCOMEND YOU JOIN)
Viola Voltairine
You’re wrong about this. I’ve written two books on the subject, and it is a movement I advocate for all day, every day. And it does NOT look like the pornogrpahic male fantasies (sorry to disappoint you guys).
https://pillarsofgynarchy.com
danny
My ex-wife, a nurse, told me very clearly that if I did not accept her full authority over me, she would have me committed on some excuse and given electric-shocks until my mind was gone. Her sister actually administered several injections in my arms whenever I showed anger. When the whole family turned against me, I got scared and ran away.
rich
Interesting comment, danny. I personally would welcome a woman taking control of my life. I would like her to enter into mind control exercises where I would become totally under her power. She would do all the thinking for me and I would worship her. If she banned me from having sex with her it would be difficult at first but under her instructions I’m sure I would learn to obey. A cock cage would ensure that I did nothing to relieve myself. I know it sounds a bit extreme but a Woman deserves that type of treatment.
Hugh
Good for you, don’t support a gynarchy movement. You don’t get to dictate what others feel. Just saying, this goes for everyone else too.
ROTCHBURNS 3.0
Dude, get a lawyer and sue her fuckin pants off.
Susan
Males have just about run the world into the ground so the time is right for Gynarchy to take over. In the future most males will be castrated at an early age. The slightest hint of aggression and their testicles are removed. Those few exceptionally well behaved intact males making it to puberty would have several sperm samples taken before they too would be castrated.
The future is Female!
ROTCHBURNS
Surrender submit sacrifice serve survive, 22843947
Emailed to viola.voltairine@gmail.com and you will see what a real gynarchist looks like.
Viola Voltairine
It seems I’ve been summoned. Gynarchy originates in the feminist anarchism of the 1970s. It posits that if women gained more power than men in society, they would wield it with FAR less violence, abuse, and exploitation than men in patriarchy. And there are two distinct versions of the word these days. One is the pornographic femdom fantasies, almost always written and imagined by kinky submissive MEN, which are quite extreme and rely heavily on the subjugation of males. However, the second type is more genuine and realistic and returns Gynarchy to its roots. It is a movement and ideology I’ve written two books about. So if you want authentic Gynarchy and not just wank material for masochists, check out the website I’ve linked here, and you’ll see what a real Gynarchist looks like.
Robert Moulds
I’d support a gynarchy that lets women and even encourages them to wear the pants grants both sexes equal rights but pants are a women’s only privilege. I have a female neighbour we traded our clothes she wear the pants and I’m in dresses. She’s empowered while I’m free of having to cover my silky smooth legs considering I don’t even want to wear pantyhose unless it’s real cold let alone pants. As for being exposed and vulnerable it’s natural for me to wear short dresses mini skirts and short shorts I even prefer halter tops to T shirts. The patriarchy is smashed, women wear what they like and I feel safe in barelegs and high heels.